Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 173,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 4:53 am
Rothman v Sandra Radna, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 33670(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152678/2023Judge: Lynn R. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:36 am
Pol v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONK. v K. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONK. v K. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
Supreme Court case — Geders v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
But in Lindke v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
By the end of the 19th century, a significant minority of states had such laws. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:53 pm
Related Cases: Lagleva v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:33 pm
The post Kansas judge blocks state abortion laws including restrictions on medication appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:22 pm
See, e.g., Castro v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:13 pm
Heller and then further prescribed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:10 pm
(Andersen, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Given Pruneyard -- which, I get, was rendered in an era in which California courts were perhaps more strongly free speech oriented than today -- I think that the state court might well have been more solicitous of the state law constitutional claim than federal judges.Plaintiff can still take its shot in the United States Supreme Court, but I don't think that'll go anywhere. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
In opposition, Mashel Law argued, inter. alia., that even though the New Jersey Supreme Court had yet to determine whether an out-of-state remote worker who worked for a New Jersey-based company is protected by New Jersey’s employment laws, the New Jersey Appellate Division in Halliday v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:02 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 10:54 am
For example, Guideline 7 states that mergers may violate antitrust laws under entrenchment theory. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
”Although the impacted individuals reported these incidents, management failed to take appropriate responsive action.Believing that this workplace environment violated federal law, particularly Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the United States Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Tax Prof Amicus Briefs for the Government: John Brooks (Fordham), David Gamage (Indiana) Brian Galle (Georgetown), Cliff Fleming (BYU), Jacob Goldin (Chicago), Edward McCaffery (USC), Ajay Mehrotra (Northwestern), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) Ari Glogower (Northwestern), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), NYU Tax Law Center Andy Grewal (Iowa)... [read post]
