Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 6981 - 7000 of 57,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
 Since it said that it doesn't matter that it wasn't part of Maciel's judgment, it was nonetheless required by state law. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
The Congressional Research Service recently said that we'd need to at least double the number of judges -- i.e., add 700 more IJs to the 649 currently on staff -- to clear the existing backlog by 2032. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:37 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court said, "We hold that the petition is ripe, because if the certification was waived, then the pendency of the State proceeding is no bar to the Commission acting on Alcoa Power's licensing application. [read post]
3 May 2014, 6:30 am by Jon Gelman
“In this interconnected world we live in, we expected MERS-CoV to make its way to the United States,” said Dr. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 1:04 pm
While the indictment does not directly accuse the Russian government of running the operation, American intelligence agencies have said that Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Viewed in the light most favorable to Kaplan, the Appellate Division concluded that these allegations stated a cause of action alleging retaliation within the meaning of the State’s Human Rights Law and New York City’s Human Rights Law, the latter being "more liberal that its state counterpart. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:31 am
The government said the case involves state secrets whose disclosure would threaten national security. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court’s sleeper case of the term, Reed v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
” [55] In Blake v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against Justice Nicklin’s meaning judgment for five out of six tweets. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
Technically, the State Bar doesn't admit -- or refuse to admit -- anyone to the Bar. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:43 am
  But I say "somewhat" because the statement (1) is only in a concurring opinion, and (2) is, to me at least, totally silly.Judge Bea categorically states that "the question whether something is 'likely to deceive' is inherently factual and should not be decided at the summary judgment stage. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:52 pm
” Similarly, when asked how he knew Roe wanted to swallow his ejaculate or to have him ejaculate on her face, Doe said, “I didn’t, but if she didn’t want to she could get out of the way and she did. [read post]