Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 57,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2021, 1:42 pm
At issue in Carson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
ShareMind-reading police officers, guns made of marshmallows, and a Woody Allen mockumentary all made rhetorical appearances during Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 10:16 am
Befort in Peterson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:44 am
” Weitzman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of Georgia issued an order in Georgia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
(China's communists bash US democracy before Biden summit) In the same vein, Xu Lin, the vice minister of the party’s publicity department was quoted as stating that “The U.S. calls itself a ‘leader of democracy’ and organizes and manipulates the so-called Summit for Democracy," he said. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
By Eric SegallDuring the Supreme Court's oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:29 am
Some states have. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:53 pm
If, contra Justice Kennedy's citationless argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday heard oral argument in Patel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:24 pm
ShareMonday’s argument in Hughes v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm
President Biden spoke with President Vladimir V. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 11:53 am
In Hand v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
He said this was due—in part—to 30 years of medical advances. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Singh v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
The lawsuit may be dismissed without a decision about the truth of the allegations (e.g., if a court concludes that the statements were privileged, or were said without "actual malice," without reaching whether they were true). [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am
Add to this the alleged potential for "abuse" of discretion by the PTO director by virtue of the Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
