Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 7001 - 7020 of 95,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2019, 7:42 pm by Allan Blutstein
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:31 am by Allan Blutstein
Marshals Service did not adequately justify its reliance on Exemption 7(E) to withhold records regarding agency’s use of cellphone tracking technology during its investigation of plaintiff, and (2) court would review in camera all records withheld pursuant to Exemption 7(C) in light of plaintiff’s status as death row inmate. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:03 am by Docket Navigator
"[Defendant] asserts that [plaintiff's] complaint lacks factual allegations that [defendant] 'controls' or 'uses' all portions of the claimed invention or that [defendant] combines all claimed elements necessary to 'make' the system. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
The majority held that the prison officials were entitled to qualified immunity on all of the plaintiff's claims. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:48 pm by A. Brian Albritton
"  Many of the sources for the article are from the plaintiffs' or relator bar. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:20 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has issued two recent notable Rule changes.Pa.R.C.P. 229 DiscontinuanceRelative to Pa.R.C.P. 229, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has amended the Rule to specifically state that, whenever a Discontinuance is sought to be entered as to less than all of the Defendants, the Discontinuance can be entered with the consent of all parties or, if that total consent is not forthcoming, a motion can be filed by the Plaintiff or the Defendant whom the… [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
All disputes arising hereunder shall be resolved by arbitration by the aforementioned committee....The court pointed out that the "general assembly" is the general membership of the mosque, and all the plaintiffs and individual defendants were members. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 2:33 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- in case concerning FBI’s search warrant to recover Hillary Clinton’s emails, affirming district court’s decision that plaintiff was not entitled to attorney’s fees because FBI’s redactions were legally reasonable and that factor outweighed all other factors. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:53 pm by Allan Blutstein
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:34 am by Docket Navigator
Following the PTAB's invalidation of all asserted claims during inter partes review, the court denied plaintiff's motion to stay pending the Supreme Court decision regarding the constitutionality of IPR proceedings in Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 12:29 pm
Hammond, Indiana - Plaintiff Duke Imports Inc. of Angola, Indiana sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant All That Jazz Trading LLC of LaGrange, Indiana infringed its trademark for BAMBOO LUXURY. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:23 am by Howard Friedman
City of Portland, (D OR, filed 4/9/2013) claimed that co-worker Theresa Lareau harassed plaintiff KellyMarie Griffin about her strong Christian beliefs, repeatedly making profane statements that offended Griffin and telling Griffin: "I’m tired of your Christian attitude and your Christian shit all over your desk and your Christian shit all over the place. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 7:30 am by Docket Navigator
Because the PTAB did not previously address every claim challenged by [defendants] -- specifically, the claims at issue in this litigation -- the PTAB modified its institution decision 'to include review of all challenged claims and all ground presented in the Petition.'. . . [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
However the court reversed the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's intentional failure to supervise claims, saying in part:Using all of the evidence before them, including Father Doyle’s expert testimony, the jury may infer Chaminade knew the risk that Brother Woulfe would visit sexual abuse upon a student was certain or substantially certain and – if so – whether Chaminade disregarded that known risk. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 2:50 pm
So an offer of $100,000 all-in wouldn't have made sense.But the standard of review on appeal is dispositive here. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:57 am by Stephen Bilkis
A doctor said that, by order dated April 1, 2005, the third-party defendant was granted summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross-claims against it. [read post]