Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 15,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
From the Re/Code interview : Q. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:57 am
When that ruling came out, I, along with many other legal wonks, speculated that it was only a matter of time before the Court took up the issue of whether or not that same restriction should also apply to juveniles convicted of murder. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
” If you’re a New York attorney and are concerned about the risks associated with returning to in-person court appearances, this opinion should provide you with some solace. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:10 pm
Throw in the 3rd DCAs view that the trial court properly denied a motion to continue to allow the defense to subpoena witnesses that just re-entered the jurisdiction, and you have all the makings of justice 3rd DCA style. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 1:58 pm
1-Be very careful about taking seemingly harsh action against employees for seemingly petty rule violations, especially when the employee is in some type of legally protected status. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Unsurprisingly, arbitration-related appellate litigation has emerged as a new legal practice niche. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 4:29 pm
To have trust, lawyers must continually earn it. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
All, of course, may well continue to resist anyway—but if so, they proceed at much greater risk to themselves. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:27 am
It is the death of the rule of law, since it allows the government to illegally injure someone, even illegally kill someone, yet be immune from suit for damages. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 1:00 am
I’ll tell you something, if you missed last week’s show we’re actually going to be continuing on a little bit of a theme that we touched on last week. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Re Neil Siegel has written a grand book on collective action problems and their pervasive role within constitutional law. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:44 am
Supreme Court ruled way back in 1990 that checkpoints were legal. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:54 am
There’s no way to articulate that rule in a way that would give anyone (least of all our judges) any objective guidance as to how they’re supposed to “enforce such a vague and amorphous standard in a fair and consistent manner. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
You need to break out of the habits, limitations and rules that you always assumed constituted the underlying framework of sole practice. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:30 pm
”4 I suppose that is true, because otherwise, the use of legal phrases like “beyond a reasonable doubt,” or the words “substantial” (as in “substantial evidence”), or “preponderance,” and numerous other pieces of legal patois would be really confusing. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 7:11 am
(But we're darned sure that we -- lawyers who must continue to defend clients in the future -- cannot post everything that we're thinking on a blog that is open to the public.)Moreover, for scholars, there are probably more rows to be hoed here, since academics have the time to do the spadework. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 3:00 pm
Yelp continued to be the most aggressive review platform o [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 5:27 am
Podcast focused on innovative and creative ideas in the legal industry. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
We’re eager to continue to work with lawmakers on optimizing the law for bringing the most data into the public, with exceptions that are narrow and clearly defined. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:53 am
And we’re glad to see that Mycroft AI has been willing to put up legal fight against these clearly invalid patents. [read post]
