Search for: "P. T.2" Results 7001 - 7020 of 14,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Justice Markman wrote for a Republican majority over three Democratic dissenters, and he implicitly endorses a view of the non-delegation doctrine popular with a wing of the Federalist Society, citing Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundythree times approvingly (p 3, n.1, p. 24, n.18, and p 41), once with a loving block quote. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 2. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
The convent had no time-temperature gauge to record and monitor the process. 2. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:14 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Luego se viene el derrape.La legitimación colectiva de las Defensorías del PuebloSin embargo, sí puede invocar un interés colectivo, p. ej., un Defensor del Pueblo. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:30 am by José Guillermo
Escribiré de la Irretroactividad de la Ley: El concepto que ha "continuación comparto NO me pertenece, lo he copiado de una página web. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d 1099). [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:37 am by JR Chaves
Tras esa sencilla obrita, no pude menos que lanzarme a comprar ansiosamente otras obras del autor, en tiempos que no había internet. 2. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:44 am by Peter Hirtle
(Continues D is for Digitize: Day 2 Morning. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In such health-effects litigation, the judicial handling of concepts such as p-values and confidence intervals often went off the rails. [read post]
5 Apr 2006, 8:40 am
Para. 1 and 2 have to be read together, as Art. 2 ensures the applicability of the conventions in all situations of international armed conflict, including occupation (which thus would be a case of armed conflicts). [read post]