Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 7001 - 7020 of 8,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm by Nathan
Tonight, we attended a panel discussion on federal sentencing that was actually worth commenting on. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  But the constitutionality of the program is raised as a separate question, in an appeal by Arizona state officials — Garriott v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:12 am by Andrew Perlman
"  Here is the abstract:This Article considers the significant state court reform developments in the year following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Caperton v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:36 pm
Project Canvas and Google to create internet-connected television – possible copyright issues (1709 Copyright Blog) Four things you wouldn't expect to be affected by piracy (Ars Technica) Software piracy rate: a see-saw effect (IP tango) Microsoft continues to impress on anti-piracy cooperation programs (China Hearsay)   Global – Trade Marks & Domains WIPO: Lego win bestcheaplego.com domain name: LEGO Juris A/S v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:20 am by Jeff Gamso
an op-ed Turow wrote back in 2000 shortly after the Supremes decided Dickerson v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This Article considers the significant state court reform developments in the year following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Caperton v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
However, the areas covered by the review would be greatly reduced from (1) an evaluation of the technical accomplishments of the Program, including a review of whether the Program has achieved the goals under the metrics established by the Council; (2) a review of the Program’s management and coordination across agencies and disciplines; (3) a review of the funding levels at each agency for the Program’s activities and the ability of each agency to achieve the Program’s… [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:39 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
That's called the Miranda warning, a requirement enshrined into law by the 1966 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. [read post]