Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 7021 - 7040 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2009, 12:32 pm
Feb. 12, 2009), a panel of the United State Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard an action arising from a contract to supply natural gas condensate in south Texas. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
" Judge Ervin further found that the claim was not preempted under the National Flood Insurance Act Arbitration The case of United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Those claims include that various products will, e.g.: “promote[ ] joint mobility & flexibility,” “protect[ ] joints from wear and tear of exercise,” “rebuild[ ] cartilage and lubricate[ ] joints,” and provide “[m]aximum strength joint comfort. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm by Jeffrey May
” Defendants would be permitted to petition the United States for permission to continue to participate in the JOE. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Sherin and Lodgen
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]