Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 7021 - 7040 of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
All of this is apparent from Magical Marking Ltd and Andrew Phillis v Holly and others [2008] EWHC (Ch) 2428, a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Mr Justice Norris, delivered yesterday.Mrs Phillis incorporated Magical Marking (the first claimant) in order to set up a children's playground painting business which used spray paint in order to mark out templates for hopscotch and other playground games. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
In relation to the harassment claim, the Court adopted the summary of the law from the English case of Dowson v Chief Constable of Northumbria ([2010] EWHC 2612 [142]). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Rick Pildes
  That is one of the more intriguing questions spawned by yesterday's decision in the child pornography case, Paroline v. [read post]