Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 7021 - 7040 of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The California appellate court has held that even though a vehicle does in fact have a temporary operating permit displayed somewhere on the vehicle, if the police officer does not see the temporary operating permit, and the vehicle does not have license plates, then the stop of the vehicle is legal. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:17 pm
  Judge Pauley granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complain on the grounds that the plaintiffs had failed to establish a strong inference that the defendants had acted with scienter. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
But when one does, it’s time for me to comment. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:41 am by John Day
He stressed that a voluntary nonsuit is not unusual and does not have any affect on the defendants’ prior notice of the claims. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:47 am by John Day
He stressed that a voluntary nonsuit is not unusual and does not have any affect on the defendants’ prior notice of the claims. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 7:43 am by Eric Caligiuri
  Defendant L’Oreal USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Defendant L’Oreal S.A., a French corporation headquartered in France. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:16 pm by Rusty Shackleford
If the gun is legal, it seems that it shouldn’t add to the defendant’s culpability. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:30 am
Here is the truth behind some of the defenses we can expect to hear this week from torture defenders. [read post]
When a plaintiff files a class action lawsuit (usually against a large corporation), she does not have to include a list of every single potential class member along with her complaint. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
Plaintiff argued that the genus of the goods in this case was “watches” but Defendants argued it was “jewelry” and the Court agreed with Defendants.This Red and Gold Cat Does Not Like to be Called "Generic"Defendants bear the burden of proving that a registered trade mark is generic, and the Ninth Circuit applies the “who-are-you/what-are-you” test to find out whether a particular mark is generic or not. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:26 am by Robin E. Shea
Years ago, I defended an employer against a pro se plaintiff who was a Seventh Day Adventist. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 3:35 am by SHG
Does it say that the jury in one trial found one defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, or does it reflect a shift in public perception of cops, of law enforcement, that enough is enough? [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
The court rejected that reasoning, observing that Rule 11 does not countenance the assertion of affirmative defense based on what another party might assert in the future, either as to claims or testimony. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That is to say, the fact that defendants in this case may have been justified in closing down Royal Crown based on their regulatory responsibilities to enforce the Health Code does not insulate them from being “subject to a claim of improper motive,” if defendants retained some discretion in how they performed their regulatory enforcement functions. [read post]