Search for: "David C " Results 7021 - 7040 of 9,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2008, 2:53 pm
But the RIAA isn't likely to sue anyone over it because) a) it's not really a bid deal b) there's no real way to find out and/or c) it would be terrible publicity to sue someone for using an iPod. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
David Faigman, for instance, has claimed that in advancing differential etiologies, expert witnesses were inventing wholesale an approach that had no foundation or acceptance in their scientific disciplines: “Differential etiology is ostensibly a scientific methodology, but one not developed by, or even recognized by, physicians or scientists. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm by centerforartlaw
David Deal David Deal, based in Charlottesville, Virginia, was a former photographer turned law student.[12] He heard about the Vivian Maier copyright dispute when he was in law school in Pennsylvania.[13] Unsettled by the idea of outsiders profiting from Maier’s legacy, he embarked on a personal quest to find Maier’s closest heir after completing his legal studies.[14] Deal was able to find another cousin of Maier, Françis Baille, whose father is Maier’s… [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:45 am by Jim Sedor
Among those charged were David Dae Sok Son, the liquor agency’s administrator. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
(c) If so, was that interference necessary in a democratic society for one of the reasons listed in Article 10(2)? [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  The plaintiff, Ruth Hickey, is the partner of David Agnew, the former husband of Adele King (better known as “Twink“), a popular Irish entertainer. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Reach out to like-minded friends to see how you might go about confirming its provenance C. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:35 am
And if the Presiding Bishop then did object to dismissing them, she herself might be charged under the provisions of Canon IV.3.1 (c):Sec. 1. [read post]