Search for: "P. T.2" Results 7021 - 7040 of 14,921
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 8:48 am
It specifically considers three such battleground campaigns: (1) the conceptualization of the state duty to protect human rights through the framing of national action plans, (2) the operationalization of the corporate responsibility to respect human rights through the framing of societally constituted reporting and assessment programs, and (3) the re-invention of the GP project as an expression of two dimensional internationalized state power and its challenge to the GP’s three… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:38 am by Broc Romanek
The letter notes that less than 25% of the S&P 500 disclosed their engagement efforts in their proxy (I note that even the ones that disclosed their engagement efforts likely didn’t mention shareholder-director engagement). 3. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:06 pm by Wetenkamp
  If 6-8 paintings are sold, then 2 paintings must be donated. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ajac Transmission Parts Corp., 911 F.2d 363, 365 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1990); Lindy Pen Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
The first  is Case T-221/12, now renumbered as Case C-142/14 P, The Sunrider Corporation v OHIM. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
Every day, someone is pleading guilty to something they didn’t do. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
Every day, someone is pleading guilty to something they didn’t do. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Breg, Inc., 2010 WL 2044248, at *2 (D. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
Following an adverse ruling by the General Court in Case T-221/12, Sunrider has launched an appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union in what is now renumbered as Case C-142/14 P The Sunrider Corporation v OHIM. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
The Court ruled on the bitter-sweet issue of the genuine use of an earlier national trade mark for the purposes of proof of use within an opposition proceeding before the OHIM (Case C-141/13 P Reber Holding GmbH & Co. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court’s conclusion: the payroll clerk was not eligible to be served with process as "a clerk" under section 2 (13). [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Peter Margulies
  Rather (p. 39), they simply “are not courts in the sense of the Judiciary Article. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel Schwartz
Supreme Court hasn’t exactly followed the EEOC’s position, so it remains unclear what the Court will do in Ms. [read post]