Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 7021 - 7040 of 55,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 5:46 pm
Here’s what we mean.When you perform a search for say, “Apple v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Particularly, interesting are two issues in the ongoing Cromer v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Mayor sought to invalidate Resolution R20-78, which was passed by the Common Council and authorized the Common Council to retain its own counsel in a dispute with the Mayor over the separation of powers between the Mayor and the Common Council. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 1:41 pm
For many who hold freedom of speech as a sacred right, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s 1919 dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:16 pm
This is due to the fact that the power of eminent domain is expansive and well-established, and often landowners do not want to spend the time and resources that would be involved in challenging a close case. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:50 pm by Matthew Guariglia
  TAKE ACTION TELL the mayor: we need protections against police surveillance Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:58 am by Thomas Baer
”Law Journal PressTo locate antitrust titles in Law Journal Press, choose “Antitrust” from the “Practice Area” dropdown menu.Antitrust Basics by Thomas V. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:52 am by Jason Mazzone
With the Supreme Court poised to decide Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 12:13 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
In early spring of last year I stated that the so-called Grand Old Party has morphed into a political party of imaginary and delusionary grievance, of crass and cartoonish schtick, of denial and desperation, of repugnance and regression, of illusion and irrationality, of empty gestures and vain cynicism, of authoritarianism and (actual and aspirational) fascism, of obscene wealth and amoral power, of sycophants and... [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:50 am
MacKinnon's analysis had, and has, great power, but it did not answer absolutely every question that the law would ultimately need to resolve. [read post]