Search for: "S. et al"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 29,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2018, 12:56 pm
Results: Botox appears not to increase the effectiveness of comprehensive rehabilitation Schasfoort et al. found no statistically significant differences between the two groups, with exception of one variable (angle-of-catch of the rectus femoris), which actually improved more in the group without botox. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:46 am
In Galderma Laboratories, LP et al v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 7:56 am
But in any event Zucman et al have found a creative and interesting new way of addressing the question, as I note very briefly in my piece and they explain at greater length in their paper.As I note in my short comment, the greater the magnitude of such income-shifting, probably the less the real responses we ought to expect to, say, the recent U.S. corporate rate cut from 35% to 21%. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 7:22 am
Settoon Towing, LLC et al., Civil Action No. 17-1933 c/w 17-2087. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
See Clinton Amos et al., A Meta-Analysis of Consumer Impulse Buying, 31 J. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 6:41 am
Toronto’s applications challenging Bill 5 were heard by the Honourable Justice Edward Belobaba at the Superior Court of Justice on August 31, 2018, and the Court’s decision was released on September 10, 2018 in City of Toronto et al v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:35 pm
We aim to extract meaningful insights about the geo-spatial and temporal distributions of clothing, fashion, and style around the world through social media analysis at scale.The question that arises from an IP standpoint is whether and to what extent unauthorized mining activities of this kind may be considered lawful.Matzen et al, 'StreetStyle: Exploring world-wide clothing styles from millions of photos' (2017) arXiv:1706.01869 [cs.CV]Instagram's… [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:34 pm
Here is a recap of August’s filings: Wright v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:28 pm
In United Valve Co., B- B-416277 et al. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:40 am
Stark in Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S et al., Civil Action No. 17-1646-LPS-CJB (D.Del. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 7:41 am
Morse, Executrix et al. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
See 2 George E.Dix, et al., McCormick on Evidence § 343 (7th ed. 2016).In the real-party-in-interest context, however, we see noparticular need to create a formal presumption—especially a presumption that would disfavor the partythat likely has inferior access to potential sources of proof.ANDThe next question then becomes: what must a patentowner do to sufficiently raise the issue? [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:58 pm
IDPH, et al. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:20 am
Philips, et al., 15EV002846. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:59 am
Facts: This case (Winkler et al v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
As some observers have suggested, for example, Roberts et al. might continue to issue rulings that amount to reversals of precedent without calling them reversals.The most widely discussed example of this would be for the Court not to overrule Roe explicitly (because that would energize even some otherwise conservative voters) but instead to decide that there simply are no abortion restrictions that constitute an “undue burden. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 3:14 pm
Related Cases: Woodhull Freedom Foundation et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 10:42 am
But what's sure to cause Qualcomm and its lawyers a lot more headache is the pressure from two important summary judgment motions: the FTC's motion in the Northern District of California seeking to clarify Qualcomm's self-imposed obligation to license rival chipset makers and--which is what this present post is about--a motion by Apple and four contract manufacturers (Foxconn, Compal, Wistron, and Pegatron) in the Southern District of California, leveraging… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:49 am
Immersion again protested NetImpact’s award before GAO in Immersion Consulting, LLC, B-415155.4 et al. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:07 am
The proposed judgment provides that “for the reasons stated in the Court’s June 21, 2018 Order, (ECF No. 80), final judgment is hereby entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and in favor of Defendants [RD Legal Funding et al.] [read post]
