Search for: "State v House"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 28,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Cohan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
Common Cause and Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:19 pm
Bernhardt (Land Into Trust) Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:19 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 9:07 am
On the facts of Calvert v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 5:45 am
In analyzing whether a preliminary injunction was appropriate, the court reviewed three factors: (1) the threat of irreparable harm to the movant; (2) the state of balance between this harm and the injury that granting the injunction will inflict on other parties litigant; (3) the probability that movant will succeed on the merits; and (4) the public interest (collectively, the Dataphase factors, in reference to an Eighth Circuit case: Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:06 pm
See Trump v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
Clark, an in-house lawyer and assistant to HAL’s CEO Stein Kruse. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:52 am
Montero (Email: gmontero@inmanstrickler.com) Robert V. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
But Pennsylvania state law seems to follow the Richardson line of reasoning in, Philadelphia Electric Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:04 am
The Ontario Divisional Court recently revisited this question in Katz et. al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:19 am
Folta v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:19 am
Folta v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
THE UNITED STATES A. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 933 Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors([2019] EWCA Civ 852) The defendant was successful in the first three cases and the claimant in third The Supreme Court heard two libel cases: Lachaux v Independent Print [2019] UKSC 27 and Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
” On the second point, the authorization for committee staff to question witnesses is an exercise of Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2)(C) of the House rules, which states that committees may so authorize staff. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As the code provides in § 36-3-301(a)(1),All regular ministers, preachers, pastors, priests, rabbis and other spiritual leaders of every religious belief, more than eighteen (18) years of age, having the care of souls, and all members of the county legislative bodies, county mayors, judges, chancellors, former chancellors and former judges of this state, former county executives or county mayors of this state, former members of quarterly county courts or county commissions,… [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:41 pm
See Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
