Search for: "State v. Price" Results 7021 - 7040 of 11,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
 Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Thomas Key
 Published by: Edward Elgar Publishing - Click here to purchaseISBN: 9781788971461eISBN: 9781788971478Hardcover Price: £180.00E-book Price: £48.00Extent: 464 pagesPublication Date: 2020 [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
As such, the claimants were entitled to repress said use in light of Article 97(2) of the Copyright Act.As a result, the court found that Audrey Hepburn's image rights had been violated, and ordered the defendant to pay the claimants EUR 45,000 as economic damage, determined on the basis of the 'price of consent', that is the price of a hypothetical licence fee. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Shamnad Basheer
A true copy of excerpts from the decision in Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm by Joe Mullin
In our view, its claims are clearly ineligible for patent protection under Alice v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:10 pm by Florian Mueller
Instead, we are now faced with a proposal that--as IP Europe's submission accurately notes and documents--is all about price regulation by two EU institutions, with the stated goal of lowering those prices. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:00 am by litigationtech
It seems ironic that they appeared in the App Store within only a few days of each other, with presumably the same purpose and target market, yet with a significant disparity in pricing. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:58 am
See also slip op. at 17 n.7 (distinguishing Klay v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
  After the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]