Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 7021 - 7040 of 19,612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court is now confronting, in the case of Alleyne v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
 Mazer v Stein, 347 US 201, 214 (1954) concerns the protection of lamps. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
As we await a ruling from the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 3:27 pm
In his stay application, Fitch contends that the Supreme Court left open the punitive issue he is now raising when the Justices, in 2003, decided the case of Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
The willingness of all judges to find a categorical distinction between physical entries and regulatory takings makes it crystal clear that the Supreme Court as a unit does not think that the ordinary laws of property still apply. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
The Court struck down these important efforts in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am by MBettman
Justice DeWine, to Cleveland’s Law Department Chief Counsel On March 6, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in City of Cleveland v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Justice and the whistleblowers’ bar.[1] In its U.S. ex rel. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
” As five justices found (in separate opinions) in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Adam Feldman
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and deals with jury damages in patent trials, is Jang v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:14 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Plata grabbed the headlines last week, but the Supreme Court’s decision in Fowler v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm by Michael O'Hear
Plata grabbed the headlines last week, but the Supreme Court’s decision in Fowler v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:03 am
"  The ruling heavily stresses both federalism and habeas concerns in its discussion of finality, and yet still suggests that the Ninth Circuit's mandate recall might still have been proper to "avoid a miscarriage of justice" concerning the legality of the applicable sentence. [read post]