Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7021 - 7040 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2016, 5:20 am by John Elwood
Lee 15-789Issue: (1) Whether, for federal habeas purposes, California’s procedural rule generally barring review of claims that were available but not raised on direct appeal is an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim; and (2) whether, when a federal habeas petitioner argues that a state procedural default is not an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim, the burden of persuasion as to adequacy rests on… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 12:01 pm by Lewis Gainor
Major fraud against the United States has its own statute of limitations. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm by Douglas Berman
In his petition for review to the Supreme Court, Molina-Martinez noted that in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm by Orin Kerr
Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, and the highest court of the pertinent state…. [read post]
24 May 2021, 6:58 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
This has caused applicants to become increasingly concerned about when they will be able to reunite with family members in the United States and return to a life of normalcy. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
” Chapman identifies professionally as having “served as the Campaign Manager for Measure 109 in Oregon, the law that legalized the first ever psilocybin therapy program in the United States,” and has been quoted speaking of 109 to the media as psilocybin therapy as recently as January 2023. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 4:38 am by Danny O'Brien
It’s theoretically possible that the final text will fail to gain a majority of member states’ approval when the European Council meets later this month, but this would require at least one key country to change its mind. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on amicus briefs in support of the respondents in Janus and in support of the petitioner in Oil States.] [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
”) The government responded by filing another brief on behalf of “the United States” authorized by the Solicitor General. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The respondents in the case are Muslim men who lawfully immigrated to the United States. [read post]