Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 22,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
McGarity v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Plaintiff failed to argue that prison policies on medicine bags substantially burdened his exercise of religion.In Bailey v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Stella v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:27 am
Religious Freedom Restoration Act–substantial burden–Ninth Circuit holds that federal cannabis prohibition is not a substantial burden. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
" The right here was burdened, according to the court, because the law "forces [adults] to choose between becoming a parent and having any meaningful type of intimate relationship outside of marriage. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:04 am
FourthEstate-v-Wall-Street.com-Opinion [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:34 am
MacDermid, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
A defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that subject matter jurisdiction exists. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this twelfth day of December in the year two thousand fifteen.BY THE GOVERNORSecretary to the Governors/ [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Slip op. at 12 (citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Anderson prescribed a balancing test, under which the burdens on voting and association should be weighed against the state’s interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
As a practical matter, complying with the FDA’s detailed regulatory regime in the shadow of 50 States’ tort regimes will dramatically increase the burdens facing potential applicants-burdens not contemplated by Congress in enacting the FDCA and the MDA. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am
[1] Hamilton v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
This case, Van v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
In Seymore v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
In Aycock v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:06 pm
They can't be used to (i) waive punitive damages, (iii) shorten the statute of limitations, (iv) force the employee to arbitrate in an out-of-state forum, or (v) unreasonably limit discovery. [read post]
