Search for: "United States of America v "
Results 7041 - 7060
of 8,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 9:52 am
Care Alternatives, 952 F.3d 89, 97 (3d Cir. 2020), and United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:56 am
At the February 20th oral argument, the two parties, and the United States, have been allocated time to argue. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Your pals, The Supreme Court of the United States of America At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr offers a follow up on Dennys Rodriguez, the prevailing party in Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:56 am
At the February 20th oral argument, the two parties, and the United States, have been allocated time to argue. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
McCarthy is right that the United States was not formally at war with Britain at that time. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:02 pm
J. 857, 870-73 (2009); United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
That must have been quite the Good Morning America appearance. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
That must have been quite the Good Morning America appearance. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
United KingdomDirector of Public Prosecutions v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:45 am
The case is Saipem America v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
Transcripts of the hearings fill three volumes of The Supreme Court of the United States: Hearings and Reports on Successful and Unsuccessful Nominations of Supreme Court Justices by the Senate Judiciary Committee, 1916-1975 compilation. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:44 am
The Supreme Court upheld the state's right to condemn and take the land upon payment of just compensation in Kelo v. [read post]
A Presidential Proclamation to End the Iraq War: Unilateral Executive Action to Defang a Zombie AUMF
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Bain, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, D.C., for amici Ad Hoc Copyright Coalition; Commercial Internet Exchange; Computer & Communications Industry Association; Information Technology Association of America; Netcoalition.com; United States Internet Industry Association, and United States Telecommunications Association. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Harman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Harman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc. [read post]
