Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 31,636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
See Ammerman v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:29 pm
Compare, for instance, Wisconsin v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:35 am
I was rereading one of my favorite opinions—Justice Jackson's dissent in U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:19 am
Tilkey v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:39 am
Garner has been advocating for placing citations in footnotes. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:00 am
Seuss Enterprises v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:43 pm
Our analysis is necessarily limited by the time sensitivities of the current crisis as well as the absence of precedent for some of what is contained here. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:12 am
Mar. 25, 2013). [4] Id. [5] Warner Brothers Pictures Inc., 197 Cal.App.2d 331. [6] See, e.g., Jegen v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
President Trump blocked travel from China on Jan. 31 and then did basically nothing until well into March. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:27 am
Dooley v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:13 am
The case is Friends of Danny DeVito et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am
” Roberts v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:41 am
The government created exceptions for churches and other places of worship as well as an opt-out process for religious non-profits for whom complying with the mandate would violate their religious beliefs. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:55 pm
Three year ago, I was in the Court for arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Fortunately, the trial court and the Appellate Division seem to understand both the equities as well as the law. [read post]
6 May 2020, 1:00 pm
The Court’s sentiment on mental health was echoed in the recent car accident trial of Syed v. [read post]
