Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 7061 - 7080 of 13,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 4:44 am by Anthony Lake
In addition, as we have noted, the Court also ruled against the Administration in Bloate v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas – El Paso: Long v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re writes that in Kansas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:55 pm by Richard A. Epstein
The Supreme Court today gave a stinging defeat to President Barack Obama in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 am by Tejinder Singh
The case before the Court this term, Perry v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
The court also commented that determination of the Nassau County Office of Labor Relations was not arbitrary or capricious since it was rationally based on the facts before it. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 10:57 am by Holland & Hart
This change also was prompted by a court ruling, namely Self v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Biskupic's story also confirms what many have long suspected about the Supreme Court's decision in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am by Cicely Wilson
”  The BIA’s interpretation benefits from administrative simplicity and fits with immigration law’s basic first-come, first-served rule.Read More:  Supreme Court setback for underage visa applicantsRead additional Supreme Court opinions handed down this week at Justia’s Supreme Court CenterAuthors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:11 am by John Jascob
The amici argued that the lower court’s failure to consider relevant precedents would subvert the North Carolina legislature’s intent to safeguard the integrity of North Carolina’s securities markets for out-of-state and North Carolina investors (NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC v. [read post]