Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 8,524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
District court's order granting summary judgment to two police officers as to an arrestee's U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:24 am
An effort to unmask the identity of blogger's sources ended at the California Appellate Court level; seeO'Grady v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm
On April 12, 2010, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, decided the case of State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
” The Supreme Court set forth three factors (Perdue v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:33 pm
The second prong, addressing RAND royalties, also suffered from an excessive reliance on the case of NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
Superior Court, 174 Cal. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm
Superior Court, 158 Cal.App.4th at 1242, 1256-57 (2008). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:12 am
In July of 2009, around the time the DA obtained a search warrant for Diener’s office, Assistant District Attorney Elizabeth Henderson, McFetridge’s superior, was quoted by the OC Register as saying about loan mod scammers: “We’re putting people in jail. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:14 pm
See Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
” Commentary on the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm
Ratliff was argued earlier this year and the Court will hear Hardt v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
The Court issued three opinions: In No. 08-1200, Jerman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:08 am
In Perdue v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:16 am
Yesterday, I paid a visit to the Supreme Court to sit in on oral argument for City of Ontario v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:24 pm
" (Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
Jeff Quon of the Ontario, Calif., police department and his texting partners drew a little sympathy from the Justices during the oral argument in Ontario v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:33 pm
The court concluded: We conclude that the City's designation of the study area properties as in need of redevelopment does not satisfy the heightened standard made applicable to such determinations by the Supreme Court's decision in Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 6:10 am
Supreme Court decision in Lyng v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm
The Superior Court Law Division, under the present law, does not establish the “record” for blight. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
