Search for: "Wells v. Place" Results 7061 - 7080 of 31,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am by Jennifer Dalven
Is the Supreme Court going to overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Matthew Hill
It is argued in this post that imprecise terminology and a failure to appreciate that Article 2 is engaged in Jamieson as well as Middleton inquests has confused this area, and that the learned judge in R (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 760 (Admin) erred by eliding the investigative duties and the case-law from which they emerged. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm by Suzanne Lambert
The fact that the Immigration Judge had the opportunity of oral evidence from Mr Ibrahim, his wife, and his brother-in-law, as well as letters of support from two of the children and his mother-in-law meant that he was better placed than the Senior Immigration Judge to carry out the balancing exercise necessary to assess whether the interference with Mr Ibrahim’s Article 8 rights prevented his removal. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:45 am
Well, those days might be back again, or at least they were for Joan Kelly. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It is a well-established principle of common law that courts will not usually do this. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
 Simplifying Community Registered Design litigation in the UK - Spin Master v PMSGuestKat Rosie Burbidge also reminds readers that there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants it to get wider circulation. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:52 am by Daniel Schwartz
In catching up over some interesting employment law cases from 2015, I came across Lennon v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:09 am by Charles Sartain
  Answer: As many as they want, but the court will only use one, says King Operating et al v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm by Minken Employment Lawyers
This question was addressed in the recent Ontario Superior Court decision of Arnone v. [read post]