Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 7081 - 7100 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
  First, an infringement suit ended in an award of $5.8 million in damages for infringement of egg pasteurization techniques in the case of Michael Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:03 pm
Heckler &;amp; Koch Inc., No. 09-cv-00051 (M.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:29 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
Texas, Houston Division, issued an opinion in the case styled, Associated Marine & Industrial Staffing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Circuit (Detroit Newspaper Agency v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
J & L Fiber Services, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Expert may testify as to technical aspects of direction and control but not as to ultimate legal conclusion: Datatreasury Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Navy: (IP Law360),Crown Packaging - Summary judgment granted to Reexam Beverage Co finding patent infringement by Crown: (Delaware IP Law),eBay - District Court held that likelihood of confusion analysis is not limited to the goods or services for which mark was registered in Applied Information Sciences v eBay: (IP Law Observer),Global Patent Holdings - GPH files another patent infringement case regarding their JPEG on a website patent:… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
United States did the Supreme Court find any authority in the “Times, Places and Manner” clause to regulate pre-election campaigning. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:41 pm by Kelly
File for harassment (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit holds-line on patent misuse defense: Princo Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]