Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 7081 - 7100 of 9,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am by Stefanie Levine
The Federal Circuit first decided Classen’s appeal in 2008, when a panel comprised of Circuit Judges Newman and Moore and District Judge Farnan (sitting by designation) held in a one-paragraph, non-precedential decision authored by Judge Moore that Classen’s claims do not satisfy 35 USC § 101. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:46 am by Lovechilde
The problems cited are the same as those typically seen in capital cases in civilian courts:  "defense attorneys who bungled representation, judges who didn't know how to properly instruct a jury and prosecutors who mishandled evidence. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:40 pm
Given that BoA purchased Countrywide for $2.5 billion, we're looking at a pretty bad investment. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Biogen et al (CAFC 2006-1634, -1649) precedential; Judges Rader (chiming in), Newman (author), Moore (dissent) The three patents contain a total of 230 claims. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Delaware dominates choice for forum, whereas outside of Delaware, publicly held targets’ states of incorporation are no more likely to be designated for forum than any other court. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
In re Poly-Gel L.L.C., Serial No. 77850772 (August 16, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am by Jay McDaniel
In that case, the court held that the first sale doctrine does prevent a copyright holder from suing for infingement when the goods were manufactured in the Inted States, exported and then purchased from an overseas wholesaler– at a price significantly less than in the United States — for re-importation. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Hey, we're talking about criminals here.Anyway, Calderon was 1998. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:52 pm by Dave Hoffman
Like scientists, judges’ empirical messages are read by elites, and thus understood through polarizing filters. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on these three section 2(d) appeals – HOMESEAL & Design, EQUINOX ARCHITECTURAL PERFORMANCE LIGHTING, REEF SAFE (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cantine Riondo – Opposer fails to serve proper and timely pre-trial disclosures, TTAB strikes testimony: Cantine Riondo S.p.A. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
Cir. 2006) (citing In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 985 (Fed. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 10:05 am by justinsilverman
If the distinction is not made, however, any policy they enact to limit speech will be judged using far more rigorous constitutional tests. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:58 pm by yugandhar.sharma
If you’re single with no children, then a judge will allocate your estate to your blood relatives in accordance with its interpretation of the law. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 9:25 am by Paul Horwitz
 Political discourse would be better off without questions on any topic that are designed to be taken out of context. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Marie Louise
The People) (ArsTechnica) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Blog) (Out-Law.com) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Minnesota: Judge again reduces award to $2250 per infringed work in Capitol Records v Thomas-Rasset – RIAA appeals (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:23 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Basically, they have to sit through a hearing, receiving abuse from a chair who goes out of his way to rule against them, and the only remedy is for a judge to re-hear the case—something that would happen regardless of what happened at the DRB. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:02 pm by Tom Lamb
District Judge John Keenan dismissed plaintiff Linda Secrest's claims for failure to warn, breach of warranty, fraudulent concealment, and punitive damages, allowing only a design defect claim to stand for trial. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Spalding Sports World- wide, Inc., 203 F.3d 800 (Fed. [read post]