Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 14,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark consisting of a two-dimensional… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:03 am
P. 59.04. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
Erica P. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
P v Q v R ~P_____ ∴ Q v R ~Q_____ ∴ R Hence, the term, “iterative disjunctive syllogism. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
State Dep't of Public Safety, 159 P. 3d 239. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 8:04 am
” (Id. at p. 1263.) [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
À titre de réparation du préjudice subi, le Tribunal a ordonné à l’employeur de cesser ces pratiques discriminatoires, de consulter la Commission canadienne des droits de la personne afin de mettre en oeuvre un plan de prévention et d’adopter une politique écrite dans un délai de six mois à la satisfaction de la plaignante, de rembourser à celle-ci le salaire et les avantages dont elle avait été… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Edlin, and Donald T. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
Professor Mark P. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Myers (1983) (p. 567). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
Scalia argues that the doctrine is “[p]atently atextual, unadministrable, and contrary to our traditional equal-protection jurisprudence. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:37 am
Los talleres, seminarios, mesas redondas y la ceremonia de apertura están abiertos al público general y la entrada es gratuita. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
This analysis is guided only by general principles, the gist of which is that “plaintiffs claiming the information in an EIR was insufficient must demonstrate that the failure to include relevant information precluded informed decision making by the lead agency or informed participation by the public”[,] although “[p]laintiffs need not show that the outcome of the administrative process would have been different if the lead agency had complied with CEQA’s… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
See also §1611(a), (b)(1), (b)(2). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
[P]etitioners’ speech focuses on the broader issue of support for the ACA, not on the voting record of a single candidate. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
The Thomas “substantial pressure” analysis, he explained, is relevant “if you don't have a direct government . . . mandate that somebody do something that violates their religion. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) — preuve pénale — nouvelle preuve — non-respect d’un engagement — sanction distincte — pertinence. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
Code 518 "may be induced by a threat, either: … 2. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:07 am
Para obtener el calendario de vistas públicas puede visitar la página http://www.asume.pr.gov y enviar sus comentarios a reglamento@asume.pr.gov. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
There are notoriously known marks (6bis Paris Convention) but these fall under 8(2)(c) CTMR, not under 8(4). [read post]
