Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 7081 - 7100 of 16,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
To reach its decision, the Ninth Circuit applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:02 am by SHG
  Instead, it holds tight to People v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:40 am by JURIST Staff
A bill to codify abortion rights was defeated Wednesday in the United States Senate. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
  While U.S. law appears to have embraced many of the substantive premises of law that contributed to the law of the Institutes, U.S. law makers—courts, legislatures and voters—retained a strong and strongly conservative adherence to its mixed system of judge administered law punctuated by bursts of statutes. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:07 am
Today, however, there is a very strong case for viewing the Fourth Amendment as part of the “process” for obtaining criminal convictions. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:38 am by Dean Freeman
But that system gave facilities strong incentive to stay compliant in the first place. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  The introduction of an advisory vote on compensation represents a massive preemption of state law. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
  It is that allegiance that provides both the power and coherence of the contributions to that work, and also an important site for the contestation of its perspective--one which continues to have the strong support of the international human rights community of civil actors, and the emerging class of law-internationalists that see in international governance structures the better way forward from out of the law-state system. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:11 am by Ronald Mann
  Last Term in Microsoft v. i4i, the Court reaffirmed long-standing rules that grant a strong presumption of validity when alleged infringers challenge patents in federal district court. [read post]