Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 7101 - 7120 of 16,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 10:41 am by David Post
, James Armstrong (1), Benjamin Lincoln (1), Edward Telfair (1). [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:05 am by Robin Shea
Here’s an example: On December 1, 2016, Mary complains to her supervisor that her co-worker, David, told her an off-color joke that made her feel uncomfortable. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
It turns out that the Supreme Court has already decided almost this exact case in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
Will anyone really care in 100 years if you had $1 million or $800,000 on January 1, 2017? [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
The removal of the words could mean: (i) abstract designs which are not tied to a design drawing or article are no longer permitted; or (ii) nothing at all - the view the authors of Copinger (17th edition) [16].Similarly, the timing for this change (or lack of change) could (i) be retrospective; (ii) apply to all cases commenced after 1 October 2014; or (iii) apply to all designs created after 1 October 2014.Unfortunately, HHJ Hacon was not required to clarify either issue… [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This means this issue did not even reach the jury and Elting won his claim challenging the Terry stop. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 The chief sponsor of the House bill, Congressman Steve Chabot (R-OH-1), said in a statement this week, “This is simple, straightforward legislation. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
Evergreen Health plans are not available on Maryland Health Connection for the 2017 plan year"This means that folks currently insured by the faltering carrier will have to choose a new one, and they have just about a week to do so (if they want to remain insured come January 1). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Although the skilled person would adopt a narrow meaning of a particular claim if there were CGK reasons as to why the wider meaning would cover implausible embodiments, this was not such a case. [read post]