Search for: "I. C. "
Results 7101 - 7120
of 55,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
A future post will cover another system I recently came across. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 4:56 am
As I read her comments, this may be a trend not easily reversed even when good times return. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:04 am
As support for this proposition, I cited to the opinion of the Court of... [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:51 pm
The numbers are way more than I expected. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 7:38 pm
I was thus a little surprised when they offered to translate the French into English for me, but I said I would do it myself. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm
As I discussed on Friday, Sen. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 8:38 am
To jazz up the story for the Prawfs audience, I’ve loosely recast it in the form of an MPRE question: Lawyer L represents Client C under a standard hourly billing agreement in a suit to recover stolen property with a value of approximately fifty million dollars. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:42 am
(Lesser Ury: Leser mit Lupe, c. 1895)So, AC has launched an Access Copyright Repertoire Look Up Tool in beta version. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
I encourage you to read Chief Justice Rogers remarks here. by Ryan C. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
A or B or C ~A B or C ~B ∴C The syllogism works as a valid form of argument if the premises are all true. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
The judge then turned to Article 3(c). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:23 am
Hey, c’mon, that’s standard Catholic doctrine! [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) With this post Flora Sapio and I (and friends from time to time) continue an experiment in collaborative dialogue. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:12 am
P. 41(f)(2)(C). 19 Thus, warrants seeking CSLI must meet this obligation of Rule 41. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:02 pm
Stay tuned, and please keep reading.And if you're so inclined, you can vote for C&C as the top blog in the "practice specific" category here. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
Ironically, having posted just yesterday about being habitually late for things, including air travel, I missed my flight this morning. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
This is made clear under section 34(1)(i) and (j). [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:23 am
A decade ago, the biggest Corp Fin-related controversy was the shareholder proposal’s “ordinary business” exclusion basis and the SEC Staff’s Cracker Barrel no-action letter under Rule 14a-8(c)(7) (the basis has since been renumbered to 14a-8(i)(7)). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
This is made clear under section 34(1)(i) and (j). [read post]
