Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 7101 - 7120
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The original lender could avoid those state-imposed limits thanks to federal preemption of state usury laws by the NBA. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Angel Rzeslawsk,The National Bank Act and the Demise of State Consumer Laws, 68 Hastings L.J. 1421 (2017).CASE CITE: Madden v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:11 am
Similarly, the New York seminal case is Mauro v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
First, with regard to acquiescence, section 48 of the Trade Marks Act of 1994 states the following: “(1) Where the proprietor of an earlier trade mark or other earlier right has acquiesced for a continuous period of five years in the use of a registered trade mark in the United Kingdom, being aware of that use, there shall cease to be any entitlement on the basis of that earlier trade mark or other right— to apply for a… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
Facts: This case (CSl Silicones v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:10 am
Their ruling could have ripple effects well beyond California: As Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have observed at Slate, over a dozen states have laws that are intended to discourage women from having abortions by requiring abortion providers to tell their patients, for example, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer or that abortion increases the risk of suicide. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:01 am
See Avakoff v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
., v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
That contest is marked not just by the distinctive narratives put forward by both sides but also by the substantial informational control that has been effectively asserted by both sides. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am
The entire statement is reprinted below: Supreme Court of the United States Christopher Anthony Floyd v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
1902 marked first case, and also introduction of Brownie camera, opened up a new field. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:46 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Citing State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Citing State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 comes from Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Marcia Coyle at Law.com, and Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm
” That proposed section contains an incorrect and misleading statement of the law regarding environmental baseline issues, in conflict with holdings of the Fifth District’s recent decision in Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
” (quotingPerfect Web Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:41 pm
Dugan v. [read post]
