Search for: "State v. Core" Results 7101 - 7120 of 7,977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am by Peter Kinder
Hall, ed., Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (New York: Oxford Univ. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Beck, et al.
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
The DoJ commended the parties but stated that despite their efforts the Amended Settlement Agreement (ASA) suffers from the same problems as its predecessor in that it“purports to grant legal rights that are difficult to square with the core principle of the Copyright Act that copyright owners generally control whether and how to exploit their works during the term of copyright. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:13 pm by MJIL
Supreme Court opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:28 am by Nicole J. Quathamer
 As required, the store explained the difference by stating only poor customer and associate relations and “LOA. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
In a Statement of Interest filed with the court on February 4, the Justice Department said: “Although the United States believes the parties have approached this effort in good faith and the amended settlement agreement is more circumscribed in its sweep than the original proposed settlement, the amended settlement agreement suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking business… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:53 am by Erin Miller
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 6:10 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V returns to this question of the value of interpretive consensus. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
PERB reverts to its earlier “past-practice” analysis in determining “unit work”Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:51 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V returns to this question of the value of interpretive consensus. [read post]