Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 7101 - 7120
of 29,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 3:14 pm
Levin v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:23 am
Connecticut’s minimum wage will increase to the highest level, at $9.15 per hour. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
7 May 2014, 1:00 pm
Bethel v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:54 pm
Citizens for Better Forestry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
to the level of spherical error.Arters involved a question that a lot of courts have considered lately with almost (but not quite) uniformly good results – preemption in the context of generic drugs following PLIVA v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 3:57 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:25 pm
Earlier this week, in a case entitled, Emery Celli Brinkerhoff & Abady, LLP v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
The Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Anastasio v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
State-level IID requirements have also faced various legal challenges. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
In Lifson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
If Question 1.3 is answered in the affirmative: Which criteria are to be used to determine whether jurisdiction under Article 5(3) of the Brussels I Regulation is established where a trade mark granted in the State of the court seised is used as an AdWord on a search engine website with a country-specific top-level domain different from that of the State of the court seised? [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:53 am
In a recent prebid protest presented by our firm, Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan, the United States Court of Federal Claims considered the protest of Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:06 am
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Sykes v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am
State oversight and greater transparency and accountability since creation of the Fair Defense Act and the Indigent Defense Commission.2/3: Two major lawsuits: Rothgery v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:51 am
In the case of Avsar v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:02 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
Three case studies are presented, including the restoration of the Everglades wetland ecosystem (as considered by the United States Supreme Court in 2004 in South Florida Water Management District v. [read post]
