Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 7101 - 7120 of 19,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
United States, 546 A.2d 414, 425 (D.C. 1988) (quoting Dunn) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Although the facts pleaded are presumed to be true and are to be accorded every favorable inference, bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by the record are not entitled to any such consideration” (Garendean Realty Owner, LLC v Lang, 175 AD3d 653, 653 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
On August 22, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit published an opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 am
Council, Community and Compromise: new trade mark law for the EU? [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Guest Blogger
On this theory, Congress simply needs to alter the proposing language and no ratifying states will be marked tardy. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily looks at Peruta v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At The American Prospect, Felicia Kornbluh weighs in on in June Medical Services v. [read post]