Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 21,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 2:12 am
Here, the defendant’s retention of the bills and her forty-six partial payments give rise to an account stated (see Morrison Cohen v, Wate rs, 13 AD3d 51 [Ist Dept 20041; Morrison Cohen Sinqer 8 Weinge in, LI P v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
State Dep’t of Human Servs., 146 N.J. 614, 621 (1996). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:24 am
Bill Lucino, Majestic Kitchens, Inc., No. 13-0796 (2d Cir. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:40 pm
[3] Feinstein v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am
Further, except where there is deceit directed against a court, Judiciary Law § 487 “applies only to wrongful conduct by an attorney in an action that is actually pending” (Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012-1013; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643, 643). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:32 am
Insofar as the breach of contract cause of action is based on alleged overbilling, described as billing for legal services that defendants allegedly performed negligently, it is duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645, 645-646 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:49 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
The Convention provides an international benchmark for data protection and is legally binding on the member states who are signatories. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
In Myers v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am
Justice Thomas agreed on the result, though argued that the unanimous jury trial guarantee of the Sixth Amendment majority should be seen as applied to the states via the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, not the Due Process Clause (his view as to the Bill of Rights more generally). [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:31 am
Will the decision in Raess v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:05 pm
Berenson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 12:48 am
Yesterday’s blockbuster student loan decision in Biden v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court called Quill Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights could not be applied to the states. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:07 pm
And the Reg A offering is exempt from state securities or “blue sky law” if it is sold to “qualified purchasers,” a term to be defined in the future. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Further, the Court decided McQuiggin v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Indeed, I was present at a NY City Council hearing on the pending gay rights bill in 1986, many years after that court ruling in People v. [read post]
