Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 7121 - 7140 of 40,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
Given that class action litigation can implicate core aspects of the defendant’s product lines or business practices or policies, effective partnering between inside and outside counsel is indispensable to ensure that the conduct of the litigation itself does not impair the ability of the company to continue to do business with as little disruption as possible. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:20 am by Sarah Aberg and Christopher Bosch
  The Court confirmed that Kokesh does not prohibit the SEC from seeking disgorgement in equity. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:06 am by Daniel Richardson
Not only does this raise the evidentiary problems that Defendant identified, but it may also provoke more difficult First Amendment questions. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:39 am by Arfaa Law Group
In the subject case, the court noted that it is established law in Maryland that an expert in a malpractice case does not have to be the same kind of practitioner as the defendant, but must practice in a related field. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
Thus, a grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of a defendant, without more, does not support a finding that the plaintiff filed or pursued the claim in bad faith. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:32 am by emagraken
Kong) the Plaintiff was involved in 2 collisions for which the Defendants were responsible. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: To satisfy the standing requirements deriving from the “case” or “controversy” language of Article III, a plaintiff must show (1) injury in fact which is (2) fairly traceable to the defendant’s misconduct (“causation”) and which can be (3) redressed by a favorable decision of the court. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm by Andrew Appel
The defendant was the Governor of New Jersey, and as governors came and went it was variously titled Gusciora v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:39 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
The case went to trial, and the jury found in favor of the family in the amount of almost $2 million for economic damages and $9 million for noneconomic damages. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:00 pm by Ron Krauss
The evidence must support a jury’s conclusion that: (1) the defendant was under an unlawful and present threat of death or serious bodily injury; (2) he did not recklessly place himself in a situation where he would be forced to engage in criminal conduct; (3) he had no reasonable legal alternative to both the criminal act and the avoidance of the threatened harm; and (4)there was a direct causal relationship between the criminal act and the avoidance of the threatened harm. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:56 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
Government immunity does not apply in every situation in which a government employee or entity causes an injury. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Even if the court does give a plaintiff another chance to obtain the expert’s report, the plaintiff will have their case delayed and likely incur additional costs as a result of their oversight. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeal held that (1) the defendant waived the argument by not raising it below, and that (2) any error was harmless because substantial evidence supported the jury's findings of liability for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and common law unfair competition, which in turn supported liability under the UCL's "unlawful" prong. [read post]