Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 17,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 10:37 am
Cir. 2007), does not apply to method claims, since methods are processes and are therefore among the expressly permitted categories of statutory subject matter. [read post]
24 May 2016, 10:16 am
So what does the Zika virus have to do with tractor-trailer safety? [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:26 pm
What Does The Final Rule Change? [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:34 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:04 am
The Sunset report concludes that the tiered structure for the amount of blanket bonds required by operators does not account for the risk of well abandonment. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am
The trial court valued the defendant’s interest at slightly over $857,000 after applying to the stipulated unadjusted value a 15% discount for goodwill, a 35% discount for lack of marketability, and after deducting the plaintiffs’ damages including legal fees. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:55 pm
So how does that occur? [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:43 pm
Projects even the U.S. services trade balance will worsen by 2032 as service imports of $7 billion swamp the estimated increase in exports of $4.8 billion (p. 35). [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:24 pm
Microsoft Corp. held that the claimed database software designed as a “self-referential” table is patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Pioneer Medical Group, held that “the Act does not apply unless the defendant health care provider had a substantial caretaking or custodial relationship, involving ongoing responsibility for one or more basic needs, with the elder patient. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:21 am
According to the DOL, 35 percent of salaried workers meet the salary-basis aspect of the new rule – i.e., by earning less than $47,476 annually ($913/week) – and will thus be eligible for overtime payments under the new rule. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:32 am
Thedistrict court dismissed the complaint after concludingthat the patent-in-suit fails to claim patent-eligible subjectmatter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:01 am
In other words, 'the claim's tie to a digital computer [does] not reduce the pre-emptive footprint of the claim since all uses of the [idea are] still covered by the claim.'" Device Enhancement LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 10:00 pm
So, this claim does not pass on the basis of "markedly different characteristics. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
But, does Riley apply to a border arrest and search? [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:30 pm
”As such, the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision that the claims at issue were directed to an abstract idea and, thus, invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:30 pm
”As such, the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision that the claims at issue were directed to an abstract idea and, thus, invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:19 am
Supreme Court decision “Whether vicarious liability should be imposed does not depend on the classification of the relationship for the purposes of taxation or national insurance. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:51 am
The use of a microprocessor, moreover, to calculate 'the amount of time left under battery power,' does not itself render the [patent] an abstract idea, particularly where [defendant] points to no evidence that the human mind could perform such calculation entirely on its own. [read post]
