Search for: "High v State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 35,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
As early as 1983, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) noted that there was a high rate of hospital emergency room misuse by Medicaid recipients who would utilize high-cost emergency rooms for the care and treatment of non-emergency medical issues. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Attorney General declined to appeal Wrenn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Then, in a case of first impression, McKithen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm
The High Court held: 1. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Famously, Judge Janis Jack of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas addressed these issues in a lengthy decision in which she excoriated physicians, medical screeners, and plaintiffs’ lawyers who she concluded had transgressed basic ground rules of medical and legal propriety in connection with silicosis claims.[2] The stakes generated by the availability of these medical/technical opinions are especially high in mass torts that involve… [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
In Freyd v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Banister v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm
[See also, The State of Bihar vs. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm
Brantley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
Mosley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 10:09 am
In the more recent case of Green v Group Ltd & Others [2019] EWHC 954 (Ch), the High Court considered whether to appoint the joint administrators of companies within the Cambridge Analytica group as liquidators despite objections from a creditor who asserted that the administrators had breached duties arising under data protection laws. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:15 am
,We wrote previously about the case Hill v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:15 am
,We wrote previously about the case Hill v. [read post]
