Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 39,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2020, 12:27 pm
Ritzen Group v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
Had it gained traction earlier, I wonder whether the district attorney (or the public) would have viewed these events a little differently. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
: I wouldn't ordinarily say this about an interlocutory appeal without any coercive decree, but I think that in this idiosyncratic situation the Court ought to grant the petitions (and thus the motions to expedite) because of the stratagem that two judges on the Fifth Circuit employed here and the foreseeable effects their manipulations will have.As I noted at the top, the Fifth Circuit panel did two indefensible things.First, it held that Section 5000A of the ACA, as amended in 2017, is… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:33 am
From the Appellate Division in Fowler v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Nor are they required to elaborate at length on this disagreement if there are other opinions that have already done so.Nonetheless, I thought that Justice Yegan (who authors today's opinion) might have wanted to expound a little more, or a little better, than he did on why the prior opinion didn't apply here.Justice Yegan's opinion basically says that regardless of whether the prior opinion is right or wrong, the present statute expressly says that a court… [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Underwood v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
Second, I have made little effort to be “fair,” at least at that term is understood politically today. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:17 am
In Bossé v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 4:28 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
My example is Monaco v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:19 pm
SerbiaMitic v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
Among the most important outstanding issues as impeachment moves to the Senate is whether senators will attempt to obtain the testimony of senior executive branch officials who have, to date, declined to testify. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The second article of the House’s impeachment resolution charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 10:01 am
Supreme Court Rules That Son of Russian Spies Is a Canadian Citizen In December 2019, the Canadian Supreme Court rendered a judgment in the case of Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am
What little precedent we have in such cases suggests that chief justices keep their heads down and, so far as possible, defer assiduously to the will of the Senate majority. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am
There is a unanimous Supreme Court case on point—United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The location of an individual's residence does little to legitimize such a mockery. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The location of an individual's residence does little to legitimize such a mockery. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:26 am
Kate Spade LLC v. [read post]
