Search for: "State v House"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 28,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 8:41 am
However, the Vowell panel found that Slusser improperly considered even earlier precedent (in Untied States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
Is “White House Warriors” right about this? [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am
” A coalition of 13 U.S. states is suing the Trump administration over its new immigration policy, Reuters writes. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:25 am
See Chamber of Commerce for Greater Philadelphia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:10 am
" The complaint (full text) in Carter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:23 am
Serving all of southern New Jersey, PCPM has additional offices in Cherry Hill, Hamilton, and Cape May Court House, NJ. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
Com’rs of Brevard Cnty. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:58 pm
As Chief Justice Roberts stated in Knick: In Williamson County [Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:03 pm
Those questions were addressed by the Supreme Judicial Court in Wallace W., a Juvenile v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:57 am
§ 552(a)(6)(E)(v)(I). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
Resolution 114 and the Report to the ABA House of Delegates may be accessed HERE. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
” In Cotten v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:00 am
Supreme Court decided Kelo v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:57 am
Housing Act of 1937; and (5) Medicaid, except for: (i) Benefits received for an emergency medical condition as described in 42 U.S.C. 1396b(v)(2)-(3), 42 CFR 440.255(c); (ii) Services or benefits funded by Medicaid but provided under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.; (iii) School-based services or benefits provided to individuals who are at or below the oldest age eligible for secondary education as determined under State or… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
From a New Hampshire Supreme Court decision earlier this year in MacDonald v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
