Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 7121 - 7140
of 41,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Deer Park Union Free School Dist., 2009 NY Slip Op 51954(U), Decided on August 31, 2009, Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Judge William B. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:18 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 11:47 am
" CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, IMMIGRATION LAW Martinez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 12:55 pm
By B. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
David B. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:12 pm
In Greenlaw v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
D is not liable for the murder of V if the direct cause of V’s death was a deliberate act by P, which was of a kind (a) unforeseen by D and (b) likely to be altogether more life threatening than acts of the kind intended or foreseen by D. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
Well, now we know.)This opinion harkens back to the days of Chief Justice Traynor -- viewed by many as one of the greatest legal talents never to sit on the United States Supreme Court -- and is similarly scholarly, progressive, empirical, and informed. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 10:35 am
In May of this year, the United States Supreme Court came down with the decision in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin stated in respect of the order: “The grant of such an order is not to punish the party concerned for its behaviour. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Raniere v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
GB 2 390 595 B (“GB 595”) were infringed by Manitou. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:51 am
Iraq applied to discharge the injunction on the grounds that the money due to the state was immune from execution by virtue of the State Immunity Act 1978, s 13(2)(b), (4) as the funds were not property “for the time being in use or intended for use for commercial purposes”. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:05 pm
” Cothron v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
Regardless of whether these things are positive states of events (e.g., that a building was "inhabited") or negative (e.g., that a building was "uninhabited" or that a victim "was not yet twelve years of age").In the actual case decided today, the relevant statute (Section 368(d) of the Penal Code) says that you get two, three or four years in prison if you're (a) "not a caretaker" of an elder or dependent adult, but (b) embezzle, steal… [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:23 pm
See Skiro v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
(B) Congress has defined a "pirate" to include someoe like Shi. [read post]
