Search for: "York v York" Results 7121 - 7140 of 51,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2007, 11:08 am
Applying the Supreme Court's 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Since that branch of petition which was to compel disclosure of certain records remains undetermined in light of [the Appellate Division's] determination," the Appellate Division held that "the [Plaintiff's] request for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs is premature (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d 731; see Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d at 828). [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Since that branch of petition which was to compel disclosure of certain records remains undetermined in light of [the Appellate Division's] determination," the Appellate Division held that "the [Plaintiff's] request for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs is premature (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d 731; see Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d at 828). [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 11:45 am
Introduction I would say that it's cold in New York City, except that I arrived here from Chicago where it was -3F on the thermometer and with the wind it felt like -20F. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:12 pm by Carolyn Elefant
If you've come here via this New York Times story, welcome to MyShingle.com, a blog that's been inspiring solo, small firm and aspiring solo lawyers since December 2002 as well as highlighting the good that we do and making sure that we have a voice in the issues that impact the legal profession. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 11:33 am
Alcott cites the Justice's ringing dissent, adopted by the Court many years later, in Olmstead v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:37 am by David Bernstein
The New York Times reports on the Andrew Sullivan vs. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
However, whether the New York Times v Sullivan precedent and its relevant extensions are fit for purpose in the 21st century is a question which is unlikely to go away. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:06 am by Nathaniel Sobel, Julia Solomon-Strauss
” Accordingly, in the court’s view, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Trump v. [read post]