Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 44,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
The Defence Contracting states are prohibited, under the Refugee Convention 1951, art 31(1), from penalising refugees fleeing persecution if they promptly submit themselves to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:02 am
In Degelmann v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:27 am
Thankfully in a Robinson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the reach of prosecutorial immunity. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
We can take a good guess why they have suddenly taken this position. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
Entm’t 200, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 pm
Piszczek v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:57 am
On Oct. 6, 2022, the European Court of Human Rights issued a decision, Liu v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
The Media, even the better ones, are simply not very good at their jobs. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
In the Good, the Bad and Ugly: One Armed Man: I've been looking for you for 8 months. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:09 am
Governor, it is “only when a legal, not a mere political, issue arises touching upon the existence or extent of a legal right that Article 131 is attracted” (citing State of Rajasthan v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
The observation that it would be inappropriate to grant someone a monopoly over such a varied collection of goods was made in the case Court of Appeal case Merck v Merck. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:33 pm
In Melville v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:28 pm
The Seventh Circuit explains in McDonald v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:00 am
We posted Wyeth's principal brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
Just eight months later, in Abrams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:56 am
Facts of the Case In the case of McCormick v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
