Search for: "Smith v. SMITH" Results 7141 - 7160 of 16,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
In his article, Matal points to the 1850 case of Gayler v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
Its reasoning for so holding is entirely consistent with the approach to section 60(2) laid down by the Court of Appeal in this country in Grimme v Scott and KCI v Smith & Nephew (see my previous judgment at [102]).Fourthly, the Court took into account (at [4.34]-[4.36]) the fact that Sun had not taken steps which it could have taken, but this does not appear to have been critical to its reasoning. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 2:22 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" Yours truly contributed the chapter on Smith v Van Gorkom. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson looks at the Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
In Employment Division v Smith (the case that gave rise to the law at issue in Boerne), the Court held that Native Americans who ingested peyote sacramentally were not exempt from state drug laws (and could, therefore, be denied unemployment benefits when fired for using peyote.) [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 28, 2009 Smith v. [read post]