Search for: "State v. F. T." Results 7141 - 7160 of 18,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Robert Chesney
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Green Edge, 620 F.3d at 1296 (quoting Chemcast Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:51 am
See Damn I'm Good Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The magistrate judge summarizes damages awards in other sexual harassment cases, as follows:Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
I can’t wait to see what the court does with those. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:55 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
"The delay of which he complains, although not as long as in some other cases, see Doggett, 505 U.S. at 648 (eight and one half year delay); United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 11:16 am by Florian Mueller
On Tuesday I mostly wanted to publish the news quickly, and I focused on the commercial consequences.The legal standard applied by Judge Koh was stated as follows in the Ninth Circuit's 2006 opinion in Miller v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
United States Bank Nat’l Assoc., 479 F.3d 994, 999 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am by Terry Hart
That decision is Harney v Sony Pictures Television, released January 7th, 2013. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The court dismissed a number of claims based on failure to warn; trespass to chattels under all states’ laws except Louisiana; the corn producers’ claims for private nuisance; Lanham Act false advertising claims to the extent based on communications that weren’t commercial advertising; fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims; and some state-law consumer protection claims, while preserving other claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 7:39 am by Rose Hughes
 Use of European file history in US claim interpretationThe Federal Circuit applied the case law of Intel v Qualcomm (21 F.4th 801, 808 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
But a new Seventh Circuit decision from just last week, United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Motor Carrier Safety Admin., 374 F.3d 1209 (DC Cir. 2004); and American Equity Investment Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]