Search for: "York v York"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 51,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 2:50 pm
Newspaper ordered to disclose the source of alleged inaccurate information it published to the individual suing for alleged defamationMatter of Pakter v New York City Dept .of Educ., 2010 NY Slip Op 32451(U, August 20, 2010, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Cynthia S. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:11 pm
In Katz v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 3:22 pm
In Holt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 11:21 am
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY - TERRORISM COVERAGE - NEW YORK STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE POLICY - INSURANCE LAW § 3404Tag 380, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:21 am
A recent Second Circuit decision, New York City v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Trump v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
In Burkhart v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:36 am
[New York Times] * More details about eBay v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
The complaint (full text) in New York State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:06 am
Employer has an obligation to provide information reasonably necessary for contract administration made in the context of disciplinary grievancesCity of New York v New York State Nurses Assn., 2015 NY Slip Op 04437, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Board of Collective Bargaining of the City of New York [Board] granted an improper practice petition to the extent of compelling the City of New York to disclose certain materials requested by the… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:30 am
This month's New York Supreme Court decision in Nakar v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 8:04 pm
The complaint (full text attached to press release) in Cunningham v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 11:00 pm
”On appeal, the Appellate Division, Third Department, was of the view that given the limited duration of the occupancy, and the fact that Obus maintained no furniture or other personal belongings in the residence, that he did not use it for work, and that it was rented it out for some 49 weeks out of the year, the tax tribunal’s decision was found to be in error, and annulled; extinguishing any tax liability.This decision, a victory for “foreign” real-estate investors, will… [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is S&S Machinery Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 12:03 pm
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Charney v. [read post]
