Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 20,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
As pointed out in the above extract, even in United States the doctrine is currently of doubtful legitimacy. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am
United Kingdom, and again in Kalogeropoulou and Others v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:40 am
MacLean v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm
Texas was decided on June 26, 2003; United States v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” McBee v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:33 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Michigan Dep't of State Police v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 6:10 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
In the United States, the courts have been highly reluctant to award emotional damages for death or injury of a pet. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm
Lippmann is cited:Unlike in the classic case of Egbert v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
In ONEOK v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
This admission goes a long way to support our conclusion: the meaning of "officers of the United States" did not drift from 1788 to 1868. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
To be sure, in 2013, in United States v. [read post]
