Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7161 - 7180
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 12:49 pm
Locke v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am
(d) A member state can refuse “social benefits to economically inactive Union citizens who exercise their right to freedom of movement solely in order to obtain another Member State’s social assistance although they do not have sufficient resources to claim a right of residence”: Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig C-133/13, [78]. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
I will not deal with (C) until I have given my decision on (A) and (B), which will happen shortly. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 11:01 pm
Dau Si Senh and others (Case C? [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
Real Estate Group v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:19 am
§ 282(b)(1) that may bar legal remedies.Accordingly, we have no judicial authority to question the law’s propriety. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:22 am
R+L Carriers v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
L'avocate pénaliste Hannelore Cayre y faisait une peinture auvitriol de la« justicedes pauvres et des proxos », du côté de l'avocaten même temps que du côté du mis en examen. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site’s contact form. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:00 am
Last week, in McKenna v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendant deceived them by (a) misstating the actual weight of usable product in each stick of its deodorant, (b) misstating the total net weight of each stick, and (c) not stating the amount of non-functional slack fill in each stick. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
” I’m pleased to say that yesterday a Montana trial court held that the Montana criminal defamation statute is facially unconstitutional, and thus dismissed the group libel charge (State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
Do not worry because our lovely friend and colleague Alberto Bellan is here to rescue you with his 63rd Never Too Late feature, summarising the best of last week's Katposts:* Publishers should not be the beneficiaries of any fair compensation, says the European Copyright SocietyThe European Copyright Society is back, and this time issues an assessment of a case currently pending before the CJEU, this being HP Belgium v Reprobel, C-572/13, a Belgian… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am
Reprobel now pending before the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU, case C-572/13). [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Reed cites a nice example, Schmidberger Internationale v Austria (Case C-112/00) [2003] ECR I-5659. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
In that setting, the United States admitted that the judge's conduct was improper. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:28 am
The final rule, which takes effect on January 11, 2016, amends the OFCCP’s regulations at 41 CFR Section 60-1 that implement EO 11246. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
In Caron v. [read post]
