Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 45,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 8:45 am
Bowman v Bowman, Case No. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:03 am
In 2009, the First Department held in Phillips v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:52 am
(Sorry the facts are so long, but I want to give you the complete details about what Danny did before you make a judgment):(1) M encounters Danny in a parking lot near her work, as Danny is on his bicycle parked three or four feet from M's car. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The human rights argument was dealt with very briefly at the end of this long judgment. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:40 am
United States (06-1164). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
United States, 133 F.3d 897, 902 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:55 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A Subway customer filed a nationwide class action lawsuit in the federal district court in Chicago, alleging that Subway violated the consumer protection statutes of all 50 states and the District of Columbia, after measuring a “Footlong” sandwich purchased from Subway and realizing it was less than 11 inches long (Buren v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:51 am
In Caperton et al v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Some holdups are still in play, including the long-since-argued case of Gill v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
"In considering the defendant's claim to a qualified privilege, the Appellate Division said that "the underlying rationale behind a qualified privilege is that so long as the privilege is not abused, the flow of information between parties sharing a common interest should not be impeded. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:25 am
Department of Labor v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:25 am
Department of Labor v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 8:39 am
California’s counties are still figuring out how to adjust to “realignment,” the name given to the state’s efforts to comply with the judicial decree, upheld in Plata v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:46 am
State. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:51 pm
Related Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
Tirthankar Roy and Anand V. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
Cliett12-773Issue: Whether, when a custodial suspect upon Miranda advice literally states that he chooses to remain silent, “clearly established Federal law” both (1) prohibits a state court from considering objective circumstances suggesting that the suspect did not intend to invoke his right; and (2) precludes the police from briefly asking the suspect to confirm his intent, so long as they commence any interrogation only after the suspect then explicitly… [read post]
