Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 7161 - 7180 of 19,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Conclusory allegations of damages or injuries predicated on speculation cannot suffice for a malpractice action, and dismissal is warranted where the allegations in the complaint are merely conclusory and speculative” (Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989, 991 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
  Where a federal requirement permits a course of conduct and the state makes it obligatory, the state’s requirement is in addition to the federal requirement and thus is preempted.McMullen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
The reasons for this phenomenon are addressed below.First, examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office are given very little time to issue Actions on what are often very complex and detailed patent applications. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews one of tomorrow’s cases, Kelly v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
” The court ordered the defendant, Mark Langford, retried or released within 180 days. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:09 am
NEW YORK COUNTYContractsContract Suit Fails; Court States Assignees Did Not Issue Prompt Notice as Per Contract ALJ Capital I, L.P. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:01 pm
When we finished reading the majority opinion in Kovach v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:05 pm
The State Bar of California may not yet be aware of Mitts’s behavior. [read post]